Szczegóły bloga

With the growing global demand for renewable energy, solar photovoltaic power generation has become a core technology in the clean energy sector. As a key component of photovoltaic systems, the performance and efficiency of solar panels directly impact power generation. When choosing solar panels, consumers often wonder whether monocrystalline or polycrystalline is better, and are also curious about the material composition of solar panels.

I. Comparison of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels

1. Characteristics of Monocrystalline Solar Panels

Monocrystalline silicon solar panels are made from silicon with a single crystal structure. They are produced using the Czochralski process to produce high-quality silicon ingots, which are then sliced ​​into thin wafers.

Advantages:

• High Efficiency: Monocrystalline silicon has a regular crystal structure, resulting in high electron transfer efficiency. The conversion efficiency is typically 20%-23% (with laboratory results exceeding 26%), resulting in higher power generation per unit area.

• High Space Utilization: Due to their high efficiency, monocrystalline panels can generate more power in limited spaces (such as urban rooftops), making them suitable for space-constrained applications.

• Attractive Appearance: Monocrystalline panels have a uniform dark blue or black surface, with often rounded corners (due to the cylindrical shape of the silicon ingots), giving them a more modern appearance and making them suitable for high-end residential or commercial buildings.

• Durability: Monocrystalline silicon is highly pure and exhibits superior degradation resistance, resulting in slow efficiency degradation over long-term use (over 10 years).

• Slightly better high-temperature performance: Monocrystalline panels experience minimal efficiency loss in high-temperature environments, making them suitable for hot regions.

Disadvantages:

• Higher cost: The manufacturing process for monocrystalline silicon is complex and energy-intensive, resulting in higher production costs and market prices than polycrystalline silicon, and a larger initial investment.

• High waste: When silicon ingots are cut into thin square wafers, a significant amount of scrap is generated, resulting in lower resource utilization.

• Sensitivity to shading: Monocrystalline panels are highly sensitive to localized shading (such as tree shadows or dust), which can result in reduced efficiency across the entire panel.

2. Characteristics of Polycrystalline Solar Panels

Polycrystalline silicon solar panels are composed of silicon materials with multiple crystal structures. Molten silicon is poured into a mold and cooled to form an ingot, resulting in a relatively complex crystal structure.

Advantages:

• Low Cost: Polycrystalline silicon boasts a simple manufacturing process and low energy consumption, resulting in production costs approximately 10%-20% lower than single crystal silicon. This makes it more competitively priced and suitable for projects with limited budgets.

• High Resource Utilization: The ingot casting method directly produces square silicon ingots, resulting in minimal cutting waste and high raw material utilization efficiency.

• Environmentally Friendly Manufacturing: Polycrystalline silicon production consumes less energy and has a smaller carbon footprint, aligning with green manufacturing trends.

• Slightly More Resilience to Shading: Due to its diverse crystal structure, polycrystalline panels experience minimal overall efficiency loss under partial shading.

Disadvantages:

• Lower efficiency: Polycrystalline silicon has numerous grain boundaries, which hinder electron migration. Conversion efficiency is typically between 17% and 20%, resulting in lower power generation per unit area than monocrystalline silicon.

• Large space requirements: Due to their lower efficiency, polycrystalline panels require a larger area to achieve the same power generation, making them unsuitable for space-constrained applications.

• Ordinary appearance: Polycrystalline panels have a blue surface with an irregular grain pattern and squared corners, resulting in a less uniform visual effect than monocrystalline panels, giving them a slightly "industrial" feel.

• Slightly poorer high-temperature performance: In high-temperature environments, the efficiency of polycrystalline panels decreases slightly more than that of monocrystalline panels, and performance is slightly worse in tropical regions.

• Lifespan degradation: Crystal defects in polycrystalline silicon can cause slightly faster efficiency degradation over long-term use, requiring more frequent inspections.

3. Application scenarios of single crystal and polycrystalline

Monocrystalline is suitable for the following scenarios:

• Limited space: For example, residential rooftops and commercial building rooftops in cities, where high efficiency is required to maximize power generation.

• High-temperature regions: For example, southern China, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East, where monocrystalline offers superior high-temperature resistance.

• High-end projects: For example, villas and green building certification projects, where the appearance and performance of monocrystalline are more in line with high-end positioning.

• Long-term investment: For users with ample budgets seeking stable returns for more than 25 years, monocrystalline offers superior durability.

• Polycrystalline is suitable for the following scenarios:

• Limited budget: For example, rural photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects and distributed power generation in developing countries, where the low cost of polycrystalline is more attractive.

• Large-scale installations: For example, ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants and desert solar projects, where polycrystalline offers a more economical solution when space is available.

• Complex environments: For example, in dusty or heavily obstructed areas, polycrystalline is slightly more adaptable to partial shading.

• Short-term returns: For users seeking a quick return on investment, polycrystalline offers a lower initial investment.

4. Market Trends and Technological Advances

In recent years, the market share of monocrystalline silicon has gradually surpassed that of multicrystalline, primarily due to the following factors:

• Technological breakthroughs: Monocrystalline silicon N-type cells (such as TOPCon and HJT) and half-cell technology have significantly improved efficiency, and the price-performance ratio of monocrystalline products continues to improve.

• Cost reduction: The expansion of monocrystalline silicon production and process optimization have narrowed the cost gap with multicrystalline (monocrystalline prices will be approximately $0.36-$0.43 per watt in 2025, while multicrystalline prices will be approximately $0.29-$0.36 per watt).

• Policy guidance: China's "dual carbon" goals are driving the development of high-efficiency photovoltaic technology, and monocrystalline is favored by policy and the market due to its high efficiency.

However, multicrystalline silicon has not completely withdrawn from the market. In some developing countries and low-budget projects, multicrystalline still has a place.

5. Recommendations for choosing between monocrystalline and polycrystalline

• Efficiency First: If space is limited or long-term returns are sought, monocrystalline is the preferred choice.

• Budget-Oriented: If initial investment is limited and installation area is sufficient, polycrystalline is more economical.

• Comprehensive Considerations: Weigh efficiency and cost based on local climate, shading conditions, and project location. For example, monocrystalline is recommended in southern coastal areas, while polycrystalline can be considered in the northwestern desert regions.